Essay on Why I Support Banning Smoking in Public Places

Some businesses prefer that no one smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Most governments have banned smoking in all public places. Based on personal experience, personality style and emotional concern, we find that some hold the notion that smoking in public places should be banned. Meanwhile, others want to be as free as possible and do as they please, as long as their actions do not violate the rights of others. From my point of view, it is more sensible to ban smoking in public places rather than allow second-hand smoke to continue to harm people nearby, who breathe in the smoke. The main reason for my partiality to banning smoking in public places is that second-hand smoke can cause disease as well as death in adults and children†¦show more content†¦Banning smoking in public places is debatably unfair to smokers. This takes away from their freedom, however, not banning it is unfair to those that do not smoke, and puts their health in danger. Smoking makes it unsafe for them to go to public places. For example, in restaurants and other public areas the smoke does not remain solely in the smoking section. Having a smoking section and a nonsmoking section in a building is better than mixing everyone together. However, if we drop dye into water, doesnt it spread? Smoke has the same effect and anyone who has ever paid attention to it will notice that fact. Smoke spreads from the smoking section all through the building in the air, therefore, spreading the dangers with it. For this reason, smoking should not be allowed in public places. The argument I support in the first paragraph is also in a position of benefit because the Surgeon Generals Report concluded, â€Å"scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variabil ity, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack†(http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0Eb=35422#two). Although I agree that there may be some reward to smoking in public places, and that second-hand smoke is notShow MoreRelatedBanning The Issue Of Banning Cigarettes1317 Words   |  6 Pagesthat regard, what are considered public places in state laws in reference to smoking is very much debatable. It is our duty as individuals to exercise certain behaviors that will benefit others, regardless of life circumstances and serve our society in the most respectable manner, in accordance to people rights and choices. Since the nineties, there has been a massive controversy on the issue of banning cigarettes in the U.S. Some claim that banning public smoking is an infringement on their freedomRead MoreShould Cigarette Smoking Be Banned?824 Words   |  3 Pages Introduction: Tobacco Humans have been using tobacco in one way or the other since ancient times. Use of doesn’t always imply smoking it, but it can be chewed or used in different forms such as Tobacco chewing, dipping tobacco, etc. History: There is no fix time for the start of the use of tobacco in humans but it has been in human use since very ancient times. Locals were using before the arrival of Europeans to Americas. Las Casas brilliantly describes in his journal what the scouts who firstRead MoreShould Smoking Be Banned?1326 Words   |  6 Pagesbreak. Even though people are well equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be and what can it causes to their hearts and lungs, they still choose to smoke. Nowadays smoking becomes a trend like a social media, and especially teenagers, are participating in this as well. Although smoking makes you a person feel relaxed from the stress, it harms the body of the smokers in the long run. We have known that smoking can kill us from past 50-60 years, and according to the World Health OrganizationRead MoreA Government And A Tobacco Company1003 Words   |  5 PagesI find the topic of ethics in business very interesting. The choices we make have consequences and those choices are made based on the context of the situation. I believe that we as people try to make the best choice for everyone. Therefore, I will discuss how a government and a tob acco company feel that they are justified in banning or opposing tobacco advertising in India. The government of India serves the people. When a product is produced that affects the health of the peopleRead MoreBanning Tobacco Advertising Ban On The Public Health Of Their People976 Words   |  4 Pagesannounce their plan to soon pass a bill banning Tobacco companies from displaying any source of advertising or sponsoring any public events. The advertising ban took effect from May 1, 2004. In October 2, 2005, the Government of India prohibited any new programs or movies from showing any actors or actresses smoking as it glorifies smoking and sends a bad message to its viewers. According to a CNN article written by Leo Juarez, some actors seem to support the smoking censorship but some film directorsRead MoreBanning Of The Law Of India1326 Words   |  6 PagesBANNING TOBACCO IN INDIA A case study in ethics management SUMMARY In order to better understand the complexities and difficulties of ethical decisions in the context of organisational management, we will examine one such decision made by the Government of India in 2001. The decision was whether to approve a bill that would place a ban on all tobacco advertising, including the sponsorship of sports and cultural events (Ban on tobacco ads by the government of India, 2001). After looking at the argumentsRead MoreShould Smoking Be Banned?2248 Words   |  9 PagesSmoking was first used for medicinal purposes in the early 1600’s. As time continued tobacco began to be smoked through pipes and eventually became rolled in paper and tobacco leaves. After smoking started becoming mainstream, people began to think of this as a social way to fit in rather than thinking of the effects it can cause to their bodies. Although the harmful side effects of smoking are now public knowledge, people still continue to smoke. Smoking can cause health issues, not o nly to thoseRead MoreThe Presentation Given By Josh Samuel Was Unique In The1364 Words   |  6 PagesThe presentation given by Josh Samuel was unique in the way that he wasn’t opposing banning the use of these alternative products indoors, but instead, made the statement that there is a differentiation between hookah and electronic cigarettes. It’s interesting because he was correct when stating the claim that every speaker has combined the two under the same policy ban when they are two completely different products with different contributing effects. However, he didn’t show any correlating evidenceRead MoreThe Truth Initiative : Digital Media And Society1593 Words   |  7 PagesDigital Media and Society By: Laudy Oliveros 6/19/2016 â€Æ' Introduction Smoking is something very common in today’s society. The majority of people had acquired the habit of smoking from relatives, close friends, or just to fit in with the group. We can see it in our work place, household, or community now even more often. Moreover, peer pressure and the need of trying something new usually attracts people to start smoking or just try it to be â€Å"cool.† As an example, in military warships chewingRead MoreEssay about Smoking In Public Places Should be Banned766 Words   |  4 Pagesmind people smoking around you in public places? According to the pro-smoking group Air Initiative 7 in 10 of you do. Do you think it is fair to discriminate against smokers, forcing them to stand outside and smoke? On the other hand is it fair that non-smokers should have to inhale second hand smoke which can dame their health? (Do you support this ban or do you oppose it?) Personally I oppose it as I believe that non-smokers shouldn’t be subjected to a smoky environment on a night out. I am a non-smoker

Cold Mountain Free Essays

On the surface, Cold Mountain is the tale of a man trying to find his way home. However, once looked at in more detail, it is seen as a story of a man looking for faith. From the very first step, Inman’s journey is one of faith, a faith that he has lost in the Civil War and is on the road to recovering. We will write a custom essay sample on Cold Mountain or any similar topic only for you Order Now We know little of Inman’s life prior to his journey, but what we do learn tells us that he was at one point a Christian. In his youth he had been taught, and he believed in, the basics of the Christian faith. Specifically, he believed in heaven, the immortality of soul, and that we are all children of God. Cold Mountain is the story of a man who has undergone a traumatic experience, the likes of which has stolen away from him all optimism and hope for a better tomorrow. However, as Inman plans to step out the window of the hospital and begin his journey home, his faith in God seems to wither away. The horrors of what he has experienced in the war have â€Å"burned away† (page 36) his Christian faith. He no longer believes in the easy answers to the problems of life given by Christians. His faith is further questioned when he meets Veasey, the preacher who has impregnated his lover and who attempts to murder her in order to cover it up. Even after Veasey is discovered and thrown out of town, claiming to be a changed man through God, his life does not show evidence of this. He goes on to rob a store and sleep with a prostitute. Upon these activities, Inman states that many preachers are just like Veasey. They claim to be able to save the worst of sinners, and yet can’t save themselves. This hypocritical lifestyle was a major contributing factor to Inman losing his faith. Inman’s spiritual struggle is not merely a battle with his own inner demons. Inman’s main struggle is with God himself, claiming to feel like an abused child of God. In a conversation with a blind man, he was stunned to discover that no person had put out the man’s eyes. He had been born that way. He then asked himself, â€Å"How did you find someone to hate for a thing that just was? â€Å". (page 82) Throughout this story, we learn that when faced with situations like this Inman blames God. He holds God responsible for the way things are. For example, when Inman travels through the woods and sees a meteor shower, he is convinced that it has been aimed at him. He looks at any unfortunate situation as a deliberate attempt by God to bring him pain. Throughout Cold Mountain, Inman faces many obstacles that question his faith. Having lost it from the beginning, these obstacles only further convince him that God is not now or ever looking out for him. Only after facing all of these obstacles does he finally find redemption in his faith through the trials of life. How to cite Cold Mountain, Essay examples Cold Mountain Free Essays Shakespeare English | Spoken Task Cold Mountain The Feel Of The Air ‘Everything had a name. To live fully in a place all your life, you kept aiming smaller and smaller in attention to detail. ’ â€Å"†¦as Swimmer explained it, the characters of those animals too would transfer to Inman- wheeling grace, soar and stoop, grim single- mindedness. We will write a custom essay sample on Cold Mountain or any similar topic only for you Order Now † Page 18 This passage admits of the intrinsic power of nature to reflect and influence a person, the function of pathetic fallacy and presumably part of ideology of he Cherokee people. Good morning Ladies and gentlemen, as you know, I am the writer of Cold Mountain, Charles Frazier. Firstly I would like to acknowledge you all for being here today and being able to explore Cold Mountain including shaping devices and techniques. I would like to examine the literary constructions in Cold Mountain, in terms of the novel’s journey and landscape structures and to attempt to determine how well these fictionally built environments reflect the internal processes of the two main characters Ada and Inman. In other words, we can connect the external environment with the internal geography to create depth. Cold Mountain is a place of intense elements, it is a place of which all emotions and actions are played out, a place where life and death is held. The novel follows Inman’s journey home from the slaughter he has witnessed in the Civil War. Inman is intelligent, literate and sensitive, although he often appears emotionally reserved. Troubled by the carnage he has witnessed, Inman seeks spiritual solace in the natural world and his memories of Ada. The feel of the air, through, suggested that they were on a ridge and that there was much open air and gravity around them† (Page 372). Inman attempts to retain his hope and his faith in a better world in the face of incomprehensible violence and cruelty. There are some characters in which are more significant in this respect than others and they have more of an actual influence on Inman’s journey. One of these characters is Veasey, the preacher. Veasey is a general negative influence on Inman’s odyssey. Despite Veaseys annoying habits, he saves Inman’s life in the end, therefor even the negative influences that Inman’s experiences on his odyssey, result in a positive outcome. I have used seasonal variation as an allegorical device to reflect the development of the characters, Ada, Inman and Ruby. These characters seem to evolve in connection with nature’s changes and cycles â€Å"The axle of my life† Each character belongs to both the present and the past; each effectively becomes a timeless traveler. Both the men and the women find Cold Mountain covered with traces of an older civilization. Arrowheads, ‘Indian’ trails and stone slabs covered with ancient writing, symbolizing a lost world that time has placed out of reach. As the writer, I use archeological objects to reintroduce the idea of man as a being who leaves only traces of his presence in the world. This chapter in the novel questions whether man evolves or regresses over time, or whether things simply change. ‘It would have been possible to frame the arrow as some relic, a piece of another world, and Ada did something like that. She saw it as an object already numbered among the things that were. (page 412). Even the landscape suggests this duality as pristine snow falls around black trees. Like life itself, the world is filled with stark contrasts. Inman exhibits cunning, bravery and especially endurance as he overcomes all challenges to reach Ada. The climax occurs when Inman, who has survived, being hunted through his travels, finally reaches Ada and finds himself at gunpoint rather than i n an embrace. The climax lingers as Inman and Ada, both considerably changed by their recent circumstances, and become reacquainted and complete their love for each other. This is shown in the small cottage located on Cold Mountain, where Ada and Inman made love. The novel cannot be described as a tragedy though, because Ada ends up with Inman’s child and his love of the idyllic lifestyle on Cold Mountain. After examining the literary constructions in Cold Mountain, in terms of the novel’s journey and landscape structures and attempting to determine how well these fictionally built environments reflect the internal processes of the two main characters Ada and Inman, have reflected and impacted not only on Ada and Inman also the novel, and the view on the readers. The novel not only connects to the external environment but also the internal geography of ourselves. Bibliography | | Internet| Williams, James B. â€Å"Customer Reviews Cold Mountain. † Amazon. com: Customer Reviews: Cold Mountain. 2 June 2008. Web. 17 Apr. 2012. http://www. amazon. com/Cold-Mountain-Charles-Frazier/product-reviews/0802142842 How to cite Cold Mountain, Papers

Controversies in the Determination of Death free essay sample

In peeping the neurological criterion, the Council was correct, but the justification of the criteria is insufficient. The neurological criteria that must be met in order for death to be declared are the irreversible cessation of heartbeat, permanent inability to breath, and total brain failure. The neurological criteria work in such a way that if they are met, it is an Indication that the Individual Is unable to perform the biological functions needed to continue to function as a human being. Meeting any of the criteria is an indication of death. If irreversible cessation of heartbeat and efforts to restore heartbeat prove unfruitful, then the heart does not pump blood around the body and the oxygen exchanges within blood is not able to occur nor are vital organs able to receive the blood and nutrients they need, which leads to total functional failure, the inability of organs to function. If the organs are unable to function, especially the heart, than the individual Is unable to carry out any further life functions, and Is therefore, dead. Permanent inability to breath does not allow the body to take in new oxygen and expel waste carbon dioxide, which further prevents the rest of the body from attaining new oxygen and performing its functions adequately. Although it may be argued that artificial ventilation can provide a means for an individual to be kept alive by breathing for them, but they are unable to breathe on their own and will never be able to do so again, and therefore, cannot perform the actions necessary to further sustain their life which Is a clear Indicant of death.Total brain failure Is the failure of all the parts of the brain, but some physiological functions of the body may still be able to be carried out, such as the liver secreting bile, assuming the individual is on a ventilator. Total brain failure is connected to death by the means that if a attain is diagnosed with total brain failure, they are unable to keep themselves alive and would otherwise be dead, If not for the ventilator.Neurological f ailure includes the criteria Involved In declaring death, therefore playing a key role In causing death. The above mentioned criteria outline the physiological occurrences that occur when neurological failure happens. The objections to the criteria argue various points that regard to how the criteria are defined. Although the Council dismisses the objections and keeps the criteria, their justification Is mistaken due to the fact that the objections pose clarifications In the arterial that would be beneficial to Incorporate.The primary objection Is In regards to organic processes are no longer carried out, even when ventilation is going out; essentially zero brain function is when death has occurred. Hans Jonas points out that there is no clear cut way to determine death because essentially, even under ventilation, the patient is still considered to be alive and his cells are still functioning. Similarly so, Dry.Alan Showmen pointed out that the patient is not totally dead by providing a list of functions carried out even after total brain failure, as long as artificial ventilation keep s the patient breathing. Showmen strongly argued the previous Justification that once the brain function stops, all physiological processes cease, which is proven false upon his findings. He is not claiming that they continue once the patient is removed from ventilation, but that the processes continue to be carried out, even without full function of the brain.In Showmans opinion, death occurs when every function has ceased, so in the case of total functional failure. Proof. Alfonse Gomez-Lobo expands on the idea that using the criteria does not alter the definition of death, but rather determining it a different way. Nevertheless, he agrees with Showmen and expands on his information, stating that the choice of a specific criterion or standard is insufficient, by itself, to determine whether someone is dead or not (Gomez-Lobo, P. S. Of DoD).He further draws attention to possible misdiagnoses based on declaring brain death, and even goes so far as to say that taking an individual off ventilation is killing them twice, death of the mind and death of the body(Gomez-Lobo, P. S. Of DoD). Dry. Edmund D. Pipelining agrees with Gomez- Lobo in that death has not only a biological definition, but also a philosophical one ND that the criteria of total brain failure do not adequately meet those requirements. Pipelining further agrees with Jonas in the aspect that trying to define death philosophically does not adequately satisfy the empirical definition required.However, Pipelining also states, While necessary, these criteria are not sufficient per SE to define death, which adheres to the Councils decision to keep the criteria being correct, but the Justification being mistaken (Pipelining, P. S. Of DoD). The Council, in their decision to keep the criteria was not mistaken, but rather the criteria Justification is incorrect. The criteria for total brain failure were insensitive to the philosophical definition of death, but the Council adheres to a more appropriate rationale discussed by Dry. Gilbert C. Mainlander. The determination of death: a philosophical rationale that seeks to characterize the fundamental work of self-preservation which any living organism must carry out if it is to remain alive goes along with the claim that death occurs when total brain failure is met because it prevents an individual from carrying out the required function to be regarded as alive (Mainlander, P. S. Of DoD). Having a drive to breathe is argued to be significantly efferent than being mechanically ventilated and clearly differs in quality of life and essence of living.There was also dispute in regards to the Dead Donor rule and claims that patients with total brain failure were being taken off ventilation at more opportune times for organ donation to occur, which is morally and philosophically unjust because essentially the person was being killed again so their organs may be harvested. The criterion are being claimed to be invalid because they do not meet philosophically accurate standards in declaring death, although there is speculation s to the fine line between death and living.Nevertheless, there is a means in which that needs to be done is to review and revise what the criteria entail and to more clearly define total brain failure. Defining the criteria more clearly not only corrects their Justification, but also provides an opportunity to provide a more philosophically acceptable definition for the criteria. Overall, redefining the criteria after taking in the consideration of all the objections would validate the criteria Justification and further support the Councils decision to keep the criteria.